Job Interview: Now With Riddles!
Some years ago, someone at Microsoft noticed that they were having a bit of a Resources problem. A Human Resources problem to be specific. There were a whole lot of job openings (thousands, in fact) and a whole lot of applications (hundreds of thousands, in fact), and no easy way to match the right applicants with the right jobs. So they decided to reinvent the Job Interview.
Traditionally, job interviews are used to ascertain two things: how competent the candidate is and how well his personality (or lack thereof) will fit in with the organization. With their introduction of Job Interview 2.0, Microsoft included both of those features and added one additional: how the candidate responds when presented with asinine, utterly pointless, and completely ridiculous brainteaser questions.
Of course, common sense tells us that a candidate who enjoys solving silly riddles would most likely enjoy solving a silly riddle at a job interview. The same can be said about pepperoni pizza: chances are, if a candidate enjoys eating pepperoni pizza, he will also enjoy eating pepperoni pizza at a job interview. Both are facts which, while completely enthralling (no way, you like pepperoni pizza, too?!), are equally as irrelevant when determining whether someone would make a good programmer.
If you haven’t seen any of the Job Interview 2.0 questions offered by Microsoft, here are a few:
- How would you determine the weight of a Boeing 747?
- Given an opaque box with three light bulbs inside and three switches outside, how would you determine which switch corresponded to which bulb if the box could be opened only once and only after all the switches were permanently set?
- You are at a ravine with three others and need to cross a rickety bridge. You can cross it in one minute, the three others can cross it in two, five, and ten, respectively. A flashlight (your group has only one) is always required to cross, and only two people can cross at a time. How do cross as quickly as possible?
Naturally, being that they’re brainteasers, no common sense or practicality is allowed. And this is precisely why I would fail miserably at this part of Job Interview 2.0:
- I’d ask Boeing… I can’t ask Boeing?! Uhh, I’d ask a librarian… Of course a librarian would know, they look stuff up, that’s their job!
- Who would build such a stupid, broken box? I’d fix it of course… I haven’t even seen the stupid box! How do you know I can’t fix it?
- Obviously, we’d leave the slow guy behind. We’re clearly in a bad place, in a bad situation, and we don’t have any time for the big fat fatty to slow us down. It’s survival!
Thankfully, Microsoft realized that the type of people who enjoy these riddles aren’t always good programmers, and good programmers aren’t always the type who enjoy these riddles. In fact, some of the folks who can solve these riddles are precisely the type of people you don’t want as programmers. Would you want to work with the guy who builds a water-displacement scale/barge, taxis a 747 to the docks, and then weights the jumbo jet using that, instead of simply calling Boeing in the first place?
《Job Interview: Now With Riddles!》相关文章
- Job Interview: Now With Riddles!
- › 网络管理员求职 job592(工作我就爱)
- › 51job英文简历范本
- › Closing the Interview and Landing the Job
- › A Job Interview Is a Screen Test, an Act
- › 什么是Job Interview?
- › The Interview Thatll Bag A Job
- › My failed job interview
- › 备战外企面试－Job Interviewing Skills
- › Job Interview:About Your Academic Records
- › How to Succeed in a Job Interview
- › Job Interview: Now With Riddles!
- › Four Steps to a Better Job Interview
- 在百度中搜索相关文章：Job Interview: Now With Riddles!
- 在谷歌中搜索相关文章：Job Interview: Now With Riddles!
- 在soso中搜索相关文章：Job Interview: Now With Riddles!
- 在搜狗中搜索相关文章：Job Interview: Now With Riddles!
